Jif says so.
Jif Natural Peanut Butter
Where purchased: Meijer
Cost: $2.22 (18 oz)
Overall rating: 2.5/5
My husband, Noah, is a Jif Man. Growing up his family had generic brand everything – except peanut butter. And they took it even further than that. No Peter Pan, no Skippy – only Jif. So, you can imagine my surprise when he suggested trying the new Natural Jif peanut butter…
Natural Jif has almost identical nutritional information to traditional Jif. There are 2 differences:
1) Natural JIF has 140 Calories from Fat, and Regular has 130.
2) Natural JIF has 75 mg of sodium, and Regular has 150 mg.
So, let me be clear. According to the nutrition label, we’re not reducing fat intake, we’re not reducing calorie intake, and we’re not reducing sugar intake by choosing Jif Natural. Only salt intake. The other differences appear when looking at the ingredients:
Jif Natural Regular Jif
Peanuts Peanuts and sugar
Sugar (is this different from peanuts, sugar?)
Less than 2% of: Less than 2% of:
Palm oil Molasses
Salt Fully hydrogenated veg. oils
Molasses (rapeseed and soybean)
Mono- and diglycerides
Salt
To be able to give a fair rating to this product, I felt I had to do somewhat of a cost/benefit analysis. Namely: does the substitution of palm oil for the fully hydrogenated vegetable oils and mono and diglycerides give me a large enough health benefit to sacrifice the taste/texture that I love about regular JIF peanut butter?
For me, the answer is no. The answer might be different for you. But here’s my reasoning (and this is where some of you might just want to skip to the next paragraph!). First, let’s take a step back and look at what we are dealing with. We are talking about ingredients that make up less than 2% of the finished product. The primary ingredient here is still peanuts, which we know are a good source of protein and more desirable fats. And even though Jif Natural boasts "Made of 90% peanuts!" on the label, Jif itself says on its Web site that all peanut butters are required by law to be at least 90% peanuts. Which means Jif regular is, too. Second, we know that the regular peanut butter contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat, because the ingredient list shows 0 grams trans fat. Further, after some research, I discovered that FULLY hydrogenated oil (as opposed to partially hydrogenated oil) has NO trans fat. So… IF there are traceable amounts of trans fat in the regular peanut butter, it would only be coming from the mono and diglycerides (fats that act as emulsifiers to provide consistent texture and prevent separation). Also, let’s look at what we are comparing it to. Palm oil – not olive oil, or canola oil, or another oil high in unsaturated fats. No, palm oil is actually very rich in saturated fat, and therefore not considered one of the more “desirable” oils to have in your diet.
I have the same complaint about Jif Natural as most people do about natural peanut butters in general – the consistency is just weird. It feels dry in the mouth and doesn’t spread as well as I’d like it to. Now, don’t get me wrong. I do think Jif made a good effort and tried to keep this product as close to the regular version as possible. It doesn’t separate at all, and it is still spreadable – just not AS spreadable. The taste was a little off for me as well – it actually had a stronger dry-roasted peanut taste. Not sure if that comes from the difference in when they add the sugar, or the reduction of salt, or the different oil? Maybe a combination.
In any case, I won’t be making the switch. Jif made a worthy attempt with this one, but I’m just not ready to give up that creamy deliciousness of the regular Jif peanut butter I love. So, I am giving it a rating of 2.5 out of 5 – I liked that it was the same price as the regular Jif, it kept some of the classic JIF qualities, and had lower sodium, but I don’t think the flavor and texture sacrifice is worth the slight health benefit.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ok, now can you try Skippy Natural and see what you think vs. Jif Natural and Regular Jif. I tried Jif Natural (after already having Skippy Natural for a while) and was very disappointed! I thought the taste was lacking big time as compared to skippy. We were never super picky about what kind of regular peanut butter we had before though. This one also doesn't separate...I'd love to hear what you think!
ReplyDeleteOkay I can't remember why (cause I am more visual and I borrowed the books from the library), but this was one of the surprise comparisons in "Eat This, Not That!" and their recommendation was to stick with the regular version too!
ReplyDeleteThis was a very thorough comparison, and switching to "natural" in this case seems more of a psychological (OK, marketing) ploy than anything to do with better or healthier eating, unless less sodium means "natural."
ReplyDeleteThe thing Jif Natural may have going for it is not its comparison to regular Jif, but to other "all natural" peanut butters. Its spreadability and lack of separation makes it superior to other "naturals," but comes with a price of the added oils and salt. Most of the other "all natural" peanut butters only contain peanuts in their ingredient list, but for many people, the oil separation, the spreadability and eventual drying out, are such a negative and definetly not worth the switch. Rather than buying "my own" peanut butter, I've tolerated the negatives and add my sugar with fruit spread.